Friday, February 27, 2009

'Assault Weapons' Ban?

.

There's lots of stuff being posted about Holder proposing renewal of the failed 'assault weapon' ban. The details will be hot and heavy, and flying freely. I'm not going to add to that din.... my own feelings on the matter are evident on both my blogs.

I would like to mention a thought though....

Obama, Holder, Clinton.... add any names to that list you want..... are not anti-gun. They have no problems at all with firearms, assault weapons, machine guns, grenades, you name it. Where they have a conflict is with honest Citizens being armed. Not criminals, but honest citizens.

All of the above are firmly in favor of heavily armed police, military, government agents, dog catchers, politicians, and their own friends and political supporters. Where they draw the line is when mere citizens desire and demand the same right.

All the gun control laws proposed and enacted have had little or no effect on crime and criminals. But.... that's not the point of those laws, is it? Lets get this straight... it's not about gun control or violent crime. It's about people control. Unarmed people are subjects.


2 comments:

Jay G said...

Amen...

Old NFO said...

Well said, well said... dammit...